Max

__**Economic Rights**__ Since the start of history men have always gained full control of their wife's property upon marriage. Many legislations have been put in place. ever since 1893, when the //Married women's property act// //1893 (NSW). In 1901 The married person's (Property & Tort) Act 1901 (NSW). This gave women// //the right to sue and to be sued.// The fair distribution of property was then even more enhanced in 1975 when the //family law Act 1975 (Cwlth)//

These legislations are not as effective as they may seem. It is suggested that in the modern age //women are smarter than men as more women have a degree and have graduated from University.// //Although the Forbes rich list top 10 is 100% made up of men. Indeed the richest person in Ausralia// //is a female, but the 5 or so to come after her are men and most business CEO's in Australia are// //predominately men.//

=Serena: I deserve equal pay=

**Serena Williams has attempted to draw a line under the equal-pay spat that has resurfaced at this Wimbledon Championships, declaring the conversation "totally over". Published on the 01/07/12**
"That was so 2000; this is 2012. Who is still thinking like that, like honestly? Get with the programme," she said after beating China's Zheng Jie 6-7 6-2 9-7 in the third round. Frenchman Gilles Simon raised the thorny topic, saying women should not receive equal pay, and that it was a matter of entertainment levels, not whether a player plays for three or five sets. "I have the feeling that men's tennis is actually more interesting than women's tennis," the men's 13th seed said, sparking the heated debate. Before declaring the issue "totally over", Serena reiterated her robust stance. "I deserve to get paid the same amount. I don't deserve less 'cause I have boobs and they don't. That's definitely not the case," she told reporters. "I worked just as hard since I was three. I think they worked hard since they were three, four, two, whatever the case is. "Actually I have a picture when I'm on the court and I'm in a stroller, so even longer than that. I definitely know my whole life has been dedicated toward being a top athlete, and I shouldn't get paid less because of my sex." Embracing Simon's argument, but countering his opinion, she hit back: "Whenever I play I get a lot of people in the stands. I'm not trying to pontificate or anything, but a lot of people do definitely show up. So that's what it's about. You got to be able to bring the crowd."

=__**Crimes agaisnt the Sovereign**__=

===Prime Minister Julia Gillard has been charged with Acts of Treason before the Courts of Australia. This is being concealed by the Governor General Quentin Bryce, the Judiciary and the Press ... who are also implicated in the treason. Brian Shaw, who has laid these charges, provides the following update.===

The following Statement was released by Brian Shaw on 20th July 2010:
Documents from the **Australian Electoral Commission** state that the disqualification of the Commonwealth of Australia **renders a person incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a member of either House**. The disqualifications operate from the time the process of election starts, that process includes **Nomination of Candidates**. On 1st January 2004, the Government of Western Australia, **without referendum process**, **removed the State of Western Australia from the Crown of the United Kingdom and as such committed treason against the Constitution.** After 1st January 2004, all Senators and House of Representatives from Western Australia **did conceal this material fact from the people of Western Australia, and the Commonwealth of Australia.** By so doing Senators and House of Representatives from Western Australia already **‘Attainted of Treason’**, did sit in the Senate and House of Representatives in the Howard / Costello reign in **Constitutional Breach of Section 44 of the Commonwealth Constitution Act.** In the period 15th December 2006 – 29th January 2007, **40 individuals were charged by Private Prosecution Right at the Melbourne Magistrates Court in Melbourne Victoria, inclusive of Julia Gillard** The **Chief Magistrate Ian Gray** stated in the Court on 15th December 2006:-

//“You will not be relying on the Constitution in **my** court”.//
Chief Magistrate Ian Gray was **charged for this statement and concealment**, but remains as Chief Magistrate today. All defendants inclusive of **Julia Gillard, John Howard, Kim Beasley, Ian Gray, Damian Bugg, Michael Jeffery** and others remain criminally charged, **pending Grand Jury hearings**, which are currently blocked by **President Chris Maxwell and Chief Justice Marilyn Warren of the Supreme Court of Victoria** in an endeavour to protect all named defendants from Grand Jury process. In the **Rudd / Gillard Government and Parliament**, both houses, Senate and House of Representatives, have **sat unlawfully during the entire term**, because of the unlawful removal of the Crown of the United Kingdom from Western Australia.
 * In the current unlawful and illegal condition of the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia**, any political party or person who selects a candidate, inclusive of the candidate to seek a seat in either House of the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia will be **‘Attainted of Treason’** and automatically disqualified, in addition to the criminal process and penalty involving Treason, found at Section 80 of the Criminal Code Act Commonwealth 1995.

The following key facts have been uncovered:

 * 1) The oath / affirmation that Julia Gillard affirmed, is not the oath / affirmation of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia. **A different oath / affirmation was substituted without referendum consent**.
 * 2) The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia under Rudd and Gillard for the last number of years has sat unlawfully, because the **Crown of the United Kingdom was removed and substituted from Western Australia without referendum consent** on 1st January 2004.
 * 3) The criminal offence of Treason was committed when the Crown of the United Kingdom was removed from the State of Western Australia **without the required State and Commonwealth Referendums** on 1st January 2004.
 * 4) **Julia Gillard, John Howard, Kim Beasley, Michael Jeffrey, Damian Bugg** and others in the period 15th December 2006 and 29th January 2007, **were criminally charged by Private Prosecution Right at the Melbourne Magistrates Court** in this period. In addition **Grand Jury applications were lodged at the Full Court of the Supreme Court Melbourne Victoria on each defendant**.
 * 5) **Julia Gillard has not revealed that these criminal charges exist**. Julia Gillard was charged with concealing treason, and as such is **disqualified from sitting in either House of Parliament because of Section 44 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia.**
 * 6) The Australian Election Paper relating to nominations states:-
 * //“The disqualification in Section 44 renders a person incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a member of either house. The disqualifications therefore operate from the time the process of election starts that process, including Nomination of Candidates”//**

=**__Preliminary Offences__**=

=Accountant jailed over $5m tax conspiracy= By court reporter Jamelle Wells Posted Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:09pm AEST [|**Related Story:** Tax inspector worried by ATO 'monopoly' power] [| **Map:** Sydney 2000] __//A former Sydney accountant has been jailed for almost nine years over a major tax conspiracy.//__ Robert Agius has been convicted of being involved in a conspiracy to defraud the Commonwealth from 1997 until October 2006. The 62-year-old will be eligible for parole in 2019. His co-accused, Kevin Zerafa, 36, was given 500 hours of community service and a suspended three-year sentence for his involvement. Agius was arrested in Perth in 2008 as part of the Australian Crime Commission's Operation Wickenby. The Supreme Court heard he helped promote a tax fraud scheme based in Vanuatu that cost the Commonwealth more than $5 million. It involved eight Australian companies transferring money into overseas accounts. Justice Carolyn Simpson said Agius was a key player in defrauding the "entire Australian society". She said the money was sent overseas then often repaid into the personal bank accounts of company directors to avoid paying company tax. Operation Wickenby is a joint taskforce involving organisations that include the Australian Federal Police, the Australian Taxation Office, Australian Crime Commission, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions. It was set up to protect the integrity of Australian financial and regulatory systems by stopping people promoting or participating in the abuse of tax or secrecy havens.

=__**White collar crime**__=

=Scuffle in Hogan's tax dust-up=

Red Hat Scale-out Storage solutions Trends, current usage and plans Paul Hogan ... had plans for a fourth Crocodile Dundee The nation's crime-fighting agency has upped the ante in its fight with the actor Paul Hogan, the film producer John Cornell and their accountant over alleged criminal tax evasion on the proceeds of the //Crocodile Dundee// films and other work. The Australian Crime Commission has launched a lawsuit in the Federal Court aimed at forcing the trio to abandon attempts to stop dozens of sensitive financial documents from being used in the commission's investigation and a parallel investigation by the Australian Taxation Office. It is the latest scuffle in a five-year dispute between the actor and his associates, and the authorities. Hogan, Cornell and their accountant, Tony Stewart, have been interviewed by the ACCC as part of the $300 million Operation Wickenby probe. Mr Stewart spent more than eight days answering questions when he was called in 2006. The trio have claimed legal privilege over the financial documents, which were seized by the ACCC in raids on Mr Stewart's home at Glenhaven in Sydney and his city office together with others held in storage by the former accountants, Ernst & Young and John Gibb. Advertisement If legal privilege is correctly claimed, it means the documents cannot be used in the investigation. The documents include an option agreement over the making of the fourth instalment in the //Crocodile Dundee// franchise - which never went ahead - as well as financial documents held by the US law firm Denton Hall Burgin & Warren. Many of the documents have been in the ACCC's hands for nearly five years and have been shared with tax authorities. The ACCC argues it can use the documents because legal privilege cannot be claimed when a crime may have been committed. The documents were made or evidence communications made in the furtherance of a crime or fraud or other impropriety, the ACCC said. It argued it had given the trio ample time to make a valid claim to shield the documents, but a convincing argument why they should be protected had not been made. 